![]() | ||
|
|
Injury Prevention 10- Year Retrospective By Lauriann Greene
December 2005 marks the 10th anniversary of Save Your Hands! , my book on injury prevention for massage therapists. This anniversary would normally have no particular significance other than for me personally, if it were not for the fact that Save Your Hands! was one of the first comprehensive books about the risk and prevalence of occupation-related injury among massage therapy students and professionals and how to effectively deal with it. The large-scale release of the book throughout North America and its extensive promotion to massage schools, along with the self-care workshops I gave across the United States and Canada, gave this topic national attention for the first time. This was also a time when public awareness of repetitive stress injuries (RSIs) was increasing, due in part to the much-publicized lawsuits brought by injured computer operators against their employers in the early 1990s. The problem of injury among massage therapists certainly existed long before 1995, and I was not the first to mention it. In the 1980s, Frances M. Tappen, in her book Healing Massage Techniques , wrote four brief, but important paragraphs about the incidence of work-related pain, arthritis of the fingers and wrists, and carpal tunnel syndrome among massage therapists.1 Maja Evans, in her 1992 release, The Ultimate Hand Book , wrote about burnout and injury among massage therapists. She claimed that “80 percent of the people who start out in bodywork drop out after the first two years,” due, among other factors, to their hands giving out and not possessing the physical stamina to do their work.2 It was evident that massage therapists were getting injured, but the cause and nature of those injuries had yet to be revealed. How far have we come in these 10 years? How has the profession responded to the challenges of a changing massage industry? Do we know more about massage-related injury now than we did a decade ago? And, most importantly, have practitioners routinely incorporated self-care and injury prevention into their lives? The Growth of an Industry Even the massage techniques we use have changed. Insurance companies want to see measurable results before they will reimburse us for massage, and practitioners have to be able to justify their techniques. Broad, light techniques that emphasized circulation or relaxation have been, in many cases, largely replaced by techniques that work on specific areas of pain or discomfort with small, repetitive movements and pressure. Massage, which was historically a holistic discipline sought to bring a sense of well-being, increased circulation, and general relaxation to the body (rather than treat specific complaints), has become much more allopathic in its approach. Western consumers, who have always been more comfortable with an allopathic approach than a holistic one, also project those expectations to the massage practitioner and expect “treatment” and deep pressure during their massages. Unfortunately, it is those small, repetitive movements with deep pressure that put the practitioner at the highest risk for injury. Massage in the 21st century is big business, estimated at more than $4 billion per year.3 The financial interests involved create an overall climate in the therapeutic workplace that is often hostile to the concept of self-care. Too often, there is a tendency to be more interested in the financial bottom line than in the health of the people who are doing the work. This was the case with large corporations that, in the 1980s and ’90s, chose to disregard the pain and dysfunction that was plaguing their employees who typed all day at poorly-designed workstations. Employees had to bring lawsuits against those corporations to convince them to start taking computer-related RSI seriously, upgrade workstations, and provide on-site education and consultation on workplace injury prevention. A search for “carpal tunnel syndrome” on Amazon.com now brings up 3,288 books, and new ones come out every month. A more educated and informed workforce has been successful in putting pressure on corporations to install ergonomic workstations to enable their employees to work comfortably. These corporations have ultimately understood that it is in their own best interest to help their workers prevent injuries that could lead to workman’s compensation claims and work absences. In the last 10 years, some massage clinics, spas, and even schools have chosen to pay more attention to their own financial interests than to protecting their students and practitioners from injury. Hundreds of massage therapy practitioners and students have written to me about their experiences. I have been disheartened to hear from many bodyworkers, even quite recently, who have been required to do a large number of massages each day with no more than five minutes break between them, often in cramped quarters unsuited to working in an ergonomic manner. I have also heard from a number of massage students and professionals that they learned little or nothing in school about injury physiology or injury prevention. It is particularly worrisome to see there are still schools that do not deal openly with the risk of injury, even though there are many students who will experience pain and injury during their massage school training. Perhaps school owners feel including injury prevention in their curricula will alert potential students to the risk of injury in the profession and dissuade them from becoming massage therapists in the first place. It also appears some schools do not teach their instructors and administrators to take their students’ pain and other injury symptoms seriously and refer them out for appropriate treatment. One student told me she was accepted into a massage school after revealing to the admissions officer that she was suffering from chronic elbow tendonitis and was told she shouldn’t worry about it because she would learn prevention techniques later on in school. She contacted me to ask my opinion before signing her enrollment papers. One can only wonder about a school that accepts a student who is already injured, without requiring she see a doctor and treat the injury before starting the program. The school officials seem more concerned about getting students to commit to their programs and pay their tuition than about protecting their health. Looking Within While some of their counterparts have not, many massage schools have done their part to inform students of the risk of work-related injury by including injury prevention information in their curricula. Recommending a book on injury prevention sends a clear message that this is a key subject Schools that have instituted injury prevention curricula demonstrate a real concern for their students’ health on a human level. They also realize it is in their own best interest to keep their students healthy and to turn out graduates who are capable of sustaining viable, long-term careers in massage. This emphasis can only increase the stature of massage as a desirable profession and legitimize the school’s claim of offering potential students a meaningful and profitable career. If Maja Evans was right, and 80 percent of last year’s graduates will last no more than two years in their careers, then the future of the massage profession and the massage school business is not bright. In the future, schools will play a major role in determining whether the massage industry continues to grow or whether so many practitioners get injured that massage gets a bad rap as a “tissue” industry: Use them up, and throw them out. While the increasing number of massage schools offering injury prevention curricula is a positive thing for the profession, I have concerns about a growing trend in schools (and in independent workshops) toward teaching “body mechanics” and touting it as the principal method of preventing massage-related injury. No one disputes the fact that it’s very important to learn how to effectively use your body as you perform massage and bodywork techniques. But learning body mechanics is not the same thing as learning injury prevention and self-care. It is the modern tendency to look for the “magic bullet,” the pill, treatment, or technique that will turn a complex problem into a simple one that can be dealt with quickly and easily. Injury prevention is a complex subject with many facets: To effectively prevent injury, we must adjust technique, become aware of our own physical advantages and disadvantages, exercise, stretch, improve posture, understand the physiology and warning signs of injury, adjust our expectations and attitudes toward massage, be smart about managing our workplace and schedule, and practice good body mechanics (among other things). Poor body mechanics are not the only causes of injury, and good body mechanics are not the only elements needed to prevent injury. If using proper body mechanics prevented injury by itself, no top-level athlete would ever get injured, since those athletes perform their sports with nearly perfect body mechanics. And yet, nearly all athletes, even the best ones, get injured at one time or another. A massage therapist who never works out, has hypermobile wrists, suddenly increases the number of massages she does per week, and uses her thumbs 95 percent of the time she massages is likely to get injured, no matter how solid her body mechanics. So indeed, this past decade has seen many positive changes in the injury prevention landscape. These changes have brought increased awareness of the risks of occupation-related injury to the public in general and massage and bodywork practitioners in particular, and a growing number of massage schools are including injury prevention information in their curricula. Certainly, then, massage therapists must be aware at this point that any hand-intensive activity can lead to repetitive stress injury, and the message has assuredly been passed within the profession that injury is a concern. And yet, many massage therapists continue to voluntarily do seven massages in a day with just enough time between them to change the sheets and continue to massage even though their hands are throbbing with pain. What’s Going on Here? This experience shows me two things: First, there is still a good deal of shame and reluctance about admitting to injury as a massage therapist; and second, there is still a lack of understanding of injury physiology among massage therapists, evidence of a lack of education on the subject. The Emotion of Injury The school administrators, instructors, and massage association leaders with whom I have spoken about this subject confirm these observations. A statistical study on the incidence of occupation-related injury among physical therapists4 recently showed that a significant percentage of those practitioners who use their hands less intensively and for shorter lengths of time in each session than massage therapists who do, experience upper extremity injury as a result of their work. In a world where anyone who works intensively with their hands is at high risk for upper extremity injury (computer operators, seamstresses, musicians, cashiers, etc.), why would massage therapists be exempt? And yet, many massage therapists still have a difficult time admitting the pain they’ve had in their hands for the past month is truly an injury and not “something that will go away if I just work through it.” If massage therapists are ashamed to have symptoms of injury, that shame is going to keep them from getting the information they need to avoid injury and the treatment they need to be able to heal. There’s an inordinate amount of denial and intolerance among massage therapists and bodyworkers on this subject. I have been surprised to receive comments, even recently, from a number of professionals who illustrate this point. Like the one who has been working for 20 years with never an ache or a pain (in my opinion, a small minority) and found it ridiculous that anyone would be concerned enough about injury prevention to buy a book on the subject. Or the one who said he was well-informed about injury physiology and has never had an injury and, therefore, couldn’t understand why anyone would need “rudimentary” and “common sense” information about pain symptoms, inflammation, and injury. After all this time, many massage therapists are still threatened by the idea of spreading information and education about injury and injury prevention within the profession. I continue to receive e-mails and letters from massage therapists who tell me they have been chastised or ridiculed by their coworkers or fellow students when they admitted to pain and injury. My personal experience with a massage-related injury that cut short my own massage career right out of massage school is understandably threatening and engenders hostility among those who prefer to believe this type of injury could never happen to them. Some of the fear of admitting to injury comes from One thing is certain: Massage therapists can be their own worst enemies. Although we’ve made great strides in the past 10 years, resistance to change of attitude, while very human, is one of the major factors holding us back from making further progress in preventing injury in our profession. Prevention in the Next Decade I hope we’ll also see a return to holistic treatment, rather than the current emphasis on spot treatment. Such a change in attitude would be better for our bodies and for the client who needs to be educated that pressure doesn’t always equal relief or appropriate treatment. Perhaps other members of the profession will come forward and recount their personal experiences with massage-related injury and how they overcame it. We’ve seen the influence that stars of sports (like Lance Armstrong) or film (like Michael J. Fox) can have in changing attitudes and creating awareness when they speak of their own struggles with illness. The more we can speak openly about this issue, the more we will combat the shame and denial that holds us back. There are many questions yet to be answered about massage-related injury. We still do not have reliable statistics to indicate what percentage of practitioners become injured, what symptoms they most frequently encounter, etc. I hope to find some of the answers to these questions in a research study, I’m preparing on the prevalence of occupational musculoskeletal injury among massage therapy and bodywork students and professionals. Associated Bodywork & Massage Professionals is my partner and sponsor for this study and you will find the results in a subsequent issue of Massage & Bodywork . Armed with these statistics, we’ll be able to more fully understand the scope of the problem and more effectively institute programs to combat it. I will continue to speak out about injury prevention, and I am working on the second edition of Save Your Hands! , which will contain more extensive documentation and updated information on the many aspects of repetitive stress injury among massage therapists, how to prevent it, and how to treat it when it happens. I look forward to continuing to develop constructive partnerships within the massage community in the next decade and beyond, to enable us to reach our common goal: reducing the risk of career-threatening injury among massage and bodywork professionals and students. This is the only way we can continue the advancement of the fascinating field of massage, which enriches our human experience. Lauriann Greene , L.M.P., is the author of Save Your Hands! Injury Prevention for Massage Therapists ( www.saveyourhands.com ). A References 2 Evans, Maja. The Ultimate Hand Book . San Francisco, CA: Laughing Duck Press; 1992. 3 Massage & Bodywork . Media kit 2004. 4 Holder, Nicole L., et al. Cause, prevalence, and response to occupational musculoskeletal injuries reported by physical therapists and physical therapy assistants. Physical Therapy Magazine 1999 July; 79(7). Share your thoughts! Click here to send a letter to the editor and let us know what you think. Your letter may be used in an upcoming issue of Massage & Bodywork magazine.
Please close window after reading. |
|
| ©2003 Associated Bodywork & Massage Professionals. All rights reserved. No portion of this website may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from ABMP. |