|
|
Reaping
the Fruits of the Insurance Tree
Provider Networks: A Shot in the Arm, or a Shot in the Dark
By Karrie Mowen, Editor
Editor's
Note
Managed
care organizations.
Provider organization networks.
Affinity programs. Non-benefit discounts.
It's the lingo of health care today and it may well be the lingo of more
and more massage therapists tomorrow.
Creating relationships with managed care organizations can be a step forward
for massage therapists into a world of acknowledged efficacy and legitimacy.
In some cases, however, creating provider/network relationships can forever
diminish one's outlook on the process. The view of massage therapists
is all over the board when it comes to insurance, massage therapy and
reimbursement and, unfortunately, there's no indication common ground
will be found any time soon. Still, as consumers continue wanting alternative
health care options and insurance companies are forced to meet those demands,
massage therapists will inevitably find themselves in the middle.
In this brief look at provider networks, we offer a peek into a managed
care organization and one of its successful providers. We follow that
with a perspective piece from authors Margie Callahan and David Luther
on the implications of insurance to the profession and a layman's look
at the downside of this relationship for massage therapists and bodyworkers.
We recognize that there are good and bad stories on both sides of the
coin, and we realize that not all views will be properly disseminated
in this short discussion. Still, we feel this "peek" is an important
beginning for therapists to come up with their own answers to the question:
Are these relationships a potential shot in the arm for my business, or
a shot in the dark?
Consensus Health; Doing it Right
With 83 million Americans1 spending $16 billion on complementary and alternative
medicine (CAM) therapies in 19972 and approximately 90% of the money they
spent on these therapies being non-reimbursable3, it's evident health
care alternatives are gaining credibility in the American consumer's eye.
Not only are these alternatives gaining credibility, they're driving the
market. In fact, in a 1997 study, almost 70% of consumers polled said
availability of alternative health care options was a top factor in choosing
a health plan.4 Taking notice of these facts are managed care organizations
eager to keep those customers who are clamoring for alternative therapies
appeased as well as create an edge in a terribly competitive market.
Today, approximately 70% of managed care programs in the United States
offer CAM services and/or discounts for those services. And that number
is expected to grow significantly. Look at Washington state. Legislation
there has mandated health plans to offer, in the form of a benefit, access
to CAM practitioners; Hawaii and New York have already forged the way.
We can assume that other states will have similar legislation presented
in the future.
Consensus Health, founded in San Francisco in 1996, was the first organization
to provide discount multi-specialty CAM-credentialed networks and services
to major health plans, which today includes Blue Shield of California,
Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina and major health plans in New
York and Maryland. Instead of offering reimbursement options, Consensus
offers 6 million-plus members access to a network of multi-specialty CAM
providers who've agreed to discount their fees up to 25% (a practice common
in the world of managed care and CAM therapies). The Consensus program
must be working, at least for the consumer - since introducing the program
in 1997, Blue Shield of California's HMO membership has grown 35% annually.
So why would a massage therapist want to get involved with a program that
discounts their services, guarantees nothing and requires a credentialing
process? "First, I believe it's the recognition of the value of the
services they provide," said Vickie Ina, senior vice president of
product development at Consensus Health. Even though it's a discount program,
Ina said the consumer sees the full value of this alternative modality
being offered in conjunction with their traditional health care.
Secondly,
Ina said it's hard to differentiate between massage practitioners. "When
they are working with a managed care program, there is recognition that
they are a quality practitioner." But, Ina said, it goes beyond public
perception. "When you have a massage therapist being recognized and
referred to, their services will be tracked and communicated to other
health care programs. Doctors will look and see outcomes, albeit anecdotal,
but the point is there is awareness that's happening." The big picture,
she continued, is that the information is being shared with more traditional
providers within a health plan.
Ina said
opportunity is the third piece to the "why" question. "This
is never going to take over their entire business, yet a vast majority
of massage therapists will get these clients as a small part of their
business. It will give them the opportunity to have another source of
revenue come into their business, and they can control that," she
said. "Unlike a physician, the massage therapist can pull out of
managed care at any time. It's simply another source of revenue...and
an opportunity to be included with quality practitioners."
Consensus
Health contracts with massage therapists, then credentials and qualifies
them. In exchange for the therapist being advertised and marketed through
Consensus, they must give a 25% discount to customers who are part of
the program. "Therapists do not pay anything to us directly,"
Ina said. This type of program eliminates the paperwork hassle, the late
payment hassle and all of the other customary disadvantages of being involved
with a managed care program. Similar discounting programs are eliminating
typical insurance reimbursement "hassles" for massage therapists
around the country.
Credentialing
One of the most controversial aspects of managed care organizations
offering CAM providers is the promise of qualified, credentialed practitioners.
Some believe the standards are not high enough in this credentialing process,
while others believe the credentialing process itself is flawed.
Ina said
Consensus credentials massage therapists just as they would physicians.
"We have credentialing standards for all modalities," she said.
Where standards exist, providers are credentialed using measures which
meet or exceed those required by the National Council for Quality Assurance
(NCQA). Where criteria doesn't exist for certain alternative specialties,
Consensus has created them to parallel the exacting standards of the NCQA.
The process of credentialing begins with a primary source verification.
Consensus verifies that practitioners have malpractice insurance, business
licenses if required, proper educational requirements and no malpractice
suits against them. Then comes a site evaluation where the facility and
their standards are also scrutinized. Finally, the potential provider's
qualifications are discussed before a peer review committee. If accepted,
providers must be recredentialed every two years.
Overall,
Ina said the response from CAM providers has been positive; turnover has
remained low. She guessed that approximately 500 massage therapists are
part of the Consensus CAM program today. Helping them stay successful
is the mission of Consensus which sends therapists "encounter books"
filled with receipts and various documentation in preparation for their
managed care initiation.
Fees
While other service providers may wait months for insurance reimbursement
and be lost in a sea of paperwork, Ina insists the discount program creates
a more "hassle-free" environment. "They're still paid on
time, there's no paperwork, no intervention of anyone else. If we were
creating a massage therapy program that was going to be in managed care,
we would try to get them the usual and customary fee, with the understanding
that they would have a delay in payment, more paperwork, etc."
Still,
even with the discount program, Ina reminds us that this is a self-referral
program complete with its own set of headaches. "They will have some
hassle factors, but the good part is, unlike a physician, massage therapists
will never be reliant on a health care payment to survive." A therapist
can also leave the program if it's not proving beneficial.
Education
Just as education of the general public is important in building respect
for the bodywork community, educating the administrators of health care
programs and the primary care physicians is just as important. Ina said
Consensus provides educational programs for physicians as a key part of
its approach, as well as encouraging the education of health plan administrators.
It's hard for someone to make crucial business and health decisions when
they don't even understand the work being done, she said.
So
Is It Working?
Julia Zarcone, certified massage therapist out of California, has been
a provider for Consensus Health since mid-1997, as well as acting as a
consultant to the company. "I was really interested in the whole
managed care environment and what it's doing to medicine," said Zarcone
of her entry into managed care. Why Consensus? "I believe the intention
of Consensus is to guide somatic and manual therapies into the managed
care arena so that therapists benefit. They're not taking advantage of
therapists or undermining their practices." Zarcone went on to say
that aligning forces with groups like Consensus has the potential to help
the profession as a whole.
Believing
that managed care will be the future for massage therapists, whether they
like it or not, Zarcone said she chose to be one of the "early adopters"
and put in her two cents when it counted most. By getting involved early
and expressing opinions, Zarcone believes massage therapists will be afforded
a more favorable outcome in the future.
Zarcone
said even though she believes that massage therapy will increasingly move
into managed care programs, it doesn't make her necessarily any happier
about all the discount programs cropping up. "I would like to see
us move steadily and more quickly toward reimbursement programs. I'm not
thrilled that all these networks are discount programs. I think the problem
is there's not a lot of agreement among practitioners what structure that
might be (for credentialing and inclusion). Just creating codes for reimbursement
will be really hard to do. But that's a whole other issue."
As
to the fee structures and discounting issues massage therapists worry
about, this therapist is not disheartened. Zarcone said it's up to therapists
to take responsibility. "We need to look carefully at our fee structures.
Therapists need to really assess what they charge and make sure they're
really charging what their work is worth." Before joining any kind
of managed care program, Zarcone recommends this kind of self-assessment
to avoid major problems down the road. "What do you charge? Do you
need to charge more? Is it worth it? Do you want to take a 25% pay cut?
If the practice won't handle it, don't join."
Even
though Zarcone hasn't seen significant increases in business because of
this insurance relationship, she said she would join all over again. She
does admit, however, that the client brought in through network referrals
is a "different kind of client," a message repeated by many.
But Zarcone doesn't see that as a bad thing. "I certainly have clients
who are easier to work with than others. At the base of it, though, is
that everyone can respond to bodywork. Everyone likes touch." She
said the client referral from the network is a client who needs more education
about bodywork, who may have never seen a massage therapist before, and
who may think the therapist can "fix them up quickly." Still,
Zarcone said she enjoys seeing people from a broader spectrum of backgrounds.
Zarcone's
advice to other massage therapists thinking of joining a managed care
organization is simple: "Find out as much as you can about the network
you're joining. What are their values? Who are they aligned with? What
are their track records? Practitioners should get as much information
about the network as the network gets about them."
Other
Advice
Ina also offers advice for massage therapists and bodyworkers to be careful
when entering into a new agreement with a managed care program. Like Zarcone,
Ina reiterates that research is paramount in developing the relationship,
just as it should be with any new business venture. Here are her recommendations
on what to look for with a managed care organization which offers or promises
reimbursement:
1. Evaluate their fee reimbursement. Is it fair?
2. Look at their turnaround time. What is their contractual time to pay
you?
3. What are your "out" clauses? Make sure you have the ability
to get out.
4. What is the product design they're going to be a part of? How are they
going to get referrals? What is the protocol for getting reimbursed?
5. Understand what the billing process will be in order for reimbursement
(special forms, etc.).
6. Ask about up-front fees. "It's not appropriate to pay for yourself
to be qualified. There's no reason to be paying for this service,"
Ina said.
Footnotes
1. David M. Eisenberg, M.D., "Trends in alternative medicine use
in the United States, 1990-1997." Journal of the American Medical
Association. Nov. 11, 1998.
2. Ibid
3. 1995 California Benchmark Compensation and Benefits Trend Survey.
4. Landmark Telephone Survey of 1,500 households, 1998.
Note
to Associated Bodywork & Massage Professionals: Refer to your December/January
2000 Different Strokes newsletter for more precautions in working with
managed care organizations.
Please close window after
reading.
|