By Erik Dalton
During adolescence, most of us recall our mother’s marching orders to “Stand up straight!” Fortunately, standing up straight wasn’t a problem for most: simply retract the shoulders, contract the abdominals, allow the head to come back, and lift the torso out of the pelvis. Yet for others, the act of standing upright wasn’t, and still isn’t, quite that easy — one hip may be higher than the other, one side of the rib cage lower. Whatever the case, all the pelvic tucking, shoulder retracting, and chin raising are usually in vain. For these individuals, “straightening up” is a frustrating experience, as they fight their bodies just to get through the day.
The reality is these people have acquired an unusual amount of lateral curvature where they should be straight. Eventually, most of these individuals end up in the office of their family doctor, chiropractor, or massage therapist hoping to find ways to alleviate the postural strain and pain they are feeling. Following an assessment of their condition, they may be introduced to the meaning of the word scoliosis.
When the general population hears the word scoliosis, the visualization of a humpbacked, crooked, and painful body usually comes to mind (see Figure 1, left). It is, indeed, a frightening experience when parents receive a call from the school nurse informing them that a scoliotic deformity has been discovered during their child’s routine screening exam. Ten in every 200 children develop scoliosis between the ages of 10 and 15. Although boys and girls seem equally affected, the curvatures in females are three to five times more likely to progress into more pronounced aberrant postural patterns.1 As scoliosis is frequently asymptomatic, it is often overlooked, and parents may only notice the child’s clothing no longer fits properly.
Fortunately, scoliosis takes many forms and need not always fall into a frightful medical category. Although it can be a very complex musculoskeletal condition, successful treatment options are available if the disorder is discovered in time. This article offers an overview of scoliotic classifications, types of curvatures, accompanying symptoms, and hands-on examples for correcting the dysfunction.
Is it Fixable or Is it Fixed?
Spinal Curves — Types and Motion
Around the turn of the century, osteopathic physician Harrison Fryette introduced the Laws of Spinal Motion in his classic book Principles of Osteopathic Technique.2 By studying movements of cadaver spines, Fryette not only helped manual therapists understand how vertebral segments respond to normal movements, but also aberrant spinal fixations such as scoliosis. Although his second law appears slightly flawed, these classic spinal biomechanical principles wonderfully detail underlying vertebral motion characteristics during the acts of forward bending, backward bending, rotation, and side bending.
Comprehension of basic joint biomechanics is fundamentally essential when assessing and treating structural and functional scoliotic clients. For example, when confronted with a right thoracic scoliosis, therapists must recognize that vertebrae at the apex of the curve are side bending left and rotating right, causing associated ribs to form a convex hump. Conversely, a lumbar scoliotic curve that side bends right and rotates left produces bulging in the lower left torso (see Figure 4, right). Formation of these distorted postures is explained in Fryette’s first law which states that lumbar and thoracic joint coupling typically occur to opposite sides. Therapists must learn to immediately identify aberrant joint coupling responsible for these crooked patterns so hands-on activating forces can restore balance and symmetry to all affected spinal and soft-tissue structures.
During the formation of a right thoracic scoliosis, the spinal transverse processes side bend left and rotate right, pushing the longissimus and iliocostalis erectors laterally. The weakened serratus posterior superior muscles responsible for binding the erectors close to midline allow the erectors to spread, much like the linea alba often permits rectus abdominis spreading during a mother’s third trimester of birth. When distended, compensations develop as bulging babies and protruding ribs are left with a terribly inadequate support system.
Stretch-weakened muscles, ligaments, and fascia are reciprocally overpowered as hypertonic erectors on the opposite side shorten, forcing the spine to bow. Typically, these myofascial tissues become neurologically inhibited due to joint dysfunction, trauma, overuse syndromes, faulty posture, or paralysis. In Figure 5, right, the therapist’s fingers tonify stretch-weakened erectors and serratus posterior muscles with fast-paced spindle stimulating maneuvers via the dynamic gamma motoneuron system. Extended fingers then hook and reposition the laterally migrated paravertebrals back on top of the bulging ribs. To lengthen the erector spinae muscles on the concave side, the therapist reaches across with extended fingers, digs into the left lamina groove, scoops out the wiry spinalis muscles, and stretches all the erectors laterally. Once some spinal bowing has been removed, additional rib cage flattening can be accomplished by depressing the scapula (see Figure 6, right), lengthening latissimus dorsi (see Figure 7, page 68), releasing the diaphragm and obliques (see Figure 8, page 68), and stretching the inferior end of the transabdominal fascial column (see Figure 9, page 68).
Classifying Spinal Curves
• Optimal spine — no scoliotic dysfunction.
• Mild scoliosis — demonstrates a thoracic curve of 5–15 degrees.
• Moderate scoliosis — denoted by 20–45 degrees of curvature.
• Severe scoliosis — represents curvature of 50 degrees or more.3
(Note: Radiologists usually allow a gray zone that represents a 5 degree range between each classification.)
Etiology and Bone Density
A pproximately 70 percent to 90 percent of scoliosis is termed idiopathic , implying no known cause for the dysfunction. However, structurally trained manual therapists often find that many idiopathic scoliotic deformities labeled as fixed (irreversible) are actually compensations due to sacral or cranial base unleveling (see Figure 10, page 69). If sacral and cranial base unleveling indeed prove to be causal factors in a portion of presumed idiopathic cases, the no-known-cause definition should no longer apply. Information sharing among complementary medical professionals concerning possible biomechanical and biochemical origins of scoliosis provides hope that someday many more cases will lose their idiopathic classification.
It is also possible that the term idiopathic scoliosis may become outdated, as recent studies demonstrate a clear link between scoliosis and lowered bone densities. For years, various research groups have focused on finding a scoliosis gene or singular cause for the disorder. Yet searching for a single solution for a complex problem may only serve to slow down the process.
Scoliosis is closely linked to low bone densities that may be influenced by a wide variety of overlapping factors including genes, estrogen levels, nutrition, exercise, and drugs. In animal studies, lowered bone density is known to be caused by a wide variety of conditions including lack of physical activity, pesticide exposure, and nutritional deficiencies. Some of these same conditions, especially the lack of exercise and nutritional deficiencies, are known to also lower bone density in humans.4 Based on these facts it seems, as with most human conditions, illogical to assume that human scoliosis would be caused by a single gene or even by genetic factors alone.
And while idiopathic scoliosis is considered to have no discernible cause, hereditary links have been established. Thus, if one child in a family presents with scoliosis, it’s well worth the time to check the others. Since this disorder can pass to offspring, parents with scoliosis should watch their children for any related signs, particularly during early teenage years.
A Closer Look at Structural Scoliosis
• Reducing gravitational exposure.
• Using traction as a basic corrective force.
• Applying pressure over the convexity of the curve.
• Creating myofascial extensibility to the concavity.
Structural scoliosis as a physical deformity is often accompanied by functional changes in the thoracic and abdominal organs as well as psychological and emotional disturbances. The extent of functional change in the heart, lungs, and other viscera is in direct proportion to the degree of the physical deformity. From puberty through middle age, scoliotic symptoms such as backaches, head/neck pain, arthritic symptoms, chest pain, and organ dysfunction cause people to seek help.
Fundamentals of Functional Scoliosis
Functional scoliosis is characterized by an asymmetric position of the trunk and back that usually diminishes during forward bending, side bending, rotational, or tractioning maneuvers. Functional scoliotic cases are frequently accompanied by other signs of faulty and relaxed posture, such as rounded shoulders, prominent abdomen, and flat feet (see Figure 11, page 69). Occurring with equal frequency in boys and girls, functional cases appear in a large percentage of all school-age children, as well as adults. People presenting with crooked spines commonly suffer from a condition termed rotoscoliosis where the base of the spine “corkscrews” toward the head as the vertebral column turns on its axis (see Figure 12, page 69). These coronal deviations often result from leg length discrepancy or pelvic imbalances.
An interesting note: Functional scoliosis is a physiologic posture that can be assumed by any normal child or adult simply by bearing more weight on one leg while standing. It is pathologic only if it becomes habitual. One may justifiably assume the existence of a constitutional defect in muscles, ligaments, body alignment, nutrition, or structure of the bones. Such a deficiency explains why, for instance, some people naturally sit and stand erectly, while others may tend to slouch and slump — whether sitting, walking, or standing.
Common Functional Patterns
• Pronated left foot/supinated right.
• Up-slipped left innominate (posterior/superior).
• Cephalad left pubic symphysis.
• Left on left sacral torsion.
• Lumbar spine side bent left/rotated right.
• Compensatory thoracic scoliosis convex left.
• Low left shoulder.
• Torsioned shoulder girdle (right forward and
• Compensatory left rotation of atlas on axis.
• Left side bending of occiput on atlas.
In a forward-bent position, the left side of the upper back may be more posterior than the right, while at the thoracolumbar junction, the right side is more prominent than the left. The ability to recognize the various rotational components and compensations is highly important during the functional scoliotic screening exam. Typically, the vertebrae in the curve tend to side bend in one direction and rotate oppositely. If three or more consecutive vertebrae side bend together to one side and rotate in the opposite direction, osteopaths refer to this as a type 1 group curve or a functional scoliotic pattern (see Figure 14, page 70).
During the initial screening exam, the client is seated and asked to forward bend. Typically, the thoracic vertebrae will rotate to the side of the hump and side bend to the opposite side. Occasionally, when assessing asymmetrical type 1 group curves, the therapist will find non-neutral vertebral coupling of rotation and side bending to the same side. This usually depends on whether the therapist is examining above or below the apex of the thoracic curve and whether side bending or rotation is introduced first.
If the convexity of the curve is opposite the short-leg side, the therapist should look for non-neutral dysfunctions (facets stuck open or closed) in the lower lumbar vertebrae and lumbosacral junction. These individuals fill our practices daily, complaining of low-back and hip pain where no pathology is present. Attempting to relieve functional scoliotic pain without a good understanding of spinal and muscle biomechanics is usually futile. Functional scoliosis is extremely common and treatment options must be developed to help this ailing population. Of course, early detection and deep-tissue corrections are vital in preventing painful compensatory spinal problems that could manifest throughout adulthood.
The Search Continues
The search for more effective therapy continues, and the present systems or methods of treatment are a great deal more effective than older procedures. In particular, postural distortions are being recognized at an earlier age (sometimes at inception), allowing the immediate use of manual therapy modalities to treat the scoliotic pattern while still in a mild to moderate stage. This alone frequently prevents progression to a severe stage that brings with it attendant functional disturbances.
So there’s good news and bad news when approaching the question of scoliosis. On the one hand, it’s all too prevalent a disorder — linked to factors that need more careful monitoring, such as environmental toxins, nutrition, and general activity levels. On the other hand, with more attention being given to the condition through objective and subjective research comes an increase in medical and manual therapy treatment options, and perhaps, soon, a cure for idiopathic and structural scoliotic cases.
Erik Dalton, Ph.D., originator of the Myoskeletal Alignment Techniques and founder of the Freedom From Pain Institute, shares a broad therapeutic background in Rolfing and manipulative osteopathy in his innovative pain-management workshops. Visit www.ErikDalton.com to view additional Myoskeletal Technique articles and new products, and to register for a free monthly technique newsletter. Call 800/709-5054 for additional information.
1 Peterson, B. Ed. Postural balance and imbalance. American Academy of Osteopathy Yearbook . 2003: 148–152.
2 Fryette, H.H. Principles of Osteopathic Technique . Indianapolis, Ind.; 1918: 231–255.
3 Kuchera, M.L. Biomechanical considerations in postural realignment. Journal of the American Academy of Osteopathy . 1987 Nov: 781–782.
4 Walker, J.M. Musculoskeletal Development. Physical Therapy . 2002 71: 879–899.
Share your thoughts! Click here to send a letter to the editor and let us know what you think. Your letter may be used in an upcoming issue of Massage & Bodywork magazine.
Please close window after reading.
|©2003 Associated Bodywork & Massage Professionals. All rights reserved. No portion of this website may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from ABMP.|